Skip to content
Entertainment & Biography

Alaskan Bush People 2019 Investigation: A Comprehensive Overview of Legal and Administrative Scrutiny

In this article

The 2019 investigations into the "Alaskan Bush People" cast primarily centered on residency disputes, building permit compliance at their Washington State "North Star Ranch," and the lingering legal aftermath of the 2014–2016 Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD) fraud case. While the family transitioned from Alaska to Washington for medical reasons, regulatory authorities and public scrutiny focused on the legitimacy of their "off-grid" lifestyle and adherence to local land-use laws.

The Context of the 2019 Investigations

To understand the investigations occurring in 2019, one must first look at the transitional state of the Brown family during this period. After Ami Brown’s lung cancer diagnosis in 2017, the family moved from the Alaskan wilderness to Southern California for her treatment, eventually settling in Okanogan County, Washington. This move was not merely a change of scenery; it was a fundamental shift in the show’s premise and a catalyst for new legal and administrative inquiries.

By 2019, the family was fully established on a 435-acre property known as "North Star Ranch" near Tonasket, Washington. The "investigation" during this timeframe was multi-faceted, involving local government oversight of their construction projects and continued public and legal scrutiny regarding their residency status, which had been the subject of a massive fraud case in Alaska just years prior.

The Washington State Land Use and Permit Scrutiny

As the family began constructing their new homestead in Washington, they encountered a hurdle that was largely absent or ignored during their time in the remote Alaskan bush: strict county building codes. In 2019, reports surfaced regarding the Okanogan County Planning and Development Department's oversight of the North Star Ranch.

Zoning and Building Compliance

In Washington State, the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) and specific county ordinances dictate how land can be developed. The Browns’ attempt to build several structures—including a main house, individual cabins for the children, and a complex wind turbine system—fell under the jurisdiction of Okanogan County.

  1. Permit Requirements: Unlike the "Wild West" depiction often seen on reality television, the family was required to submit formal plans for plumbing, electrical work, and structural integrity.
  2. Environmental Impact: Because the ranch is located in a region prone to wildfires and has specific water rights regulations, the family faced inquiries regarding their water usage and the safety of their unconventional building materials.
  3. The "Browntown" 2.0 Challenge: Fans and local residents alike questioned whether the structures seen on the Discovery Channel show were actually permitted for year-round habitation. Administrative records from this period indicate that while some permits were filed, the timeline of construction often outpaced the legal approval process, leading to "stop-work" warnings and site inspections.

The Myth of Isolation vs. Local Reality

The 2019 investigation by local media and online "watchdog" groups highlighted a discrepancy between the show's narrative and the family's actual proximity to civilization. While the show portrayed them as living deep in the wilderness, the North Star Ranch was accessible by standard roads and was subject to the same property tax and zoning investigations as any other large ranch in the area. This led to an informal but rigorous public investigation into the show's authenticity, which peaked during the 2019 filming season.

'Alaskan Bush People's Bear Brown Shares Rare Photos of Kids
'Alaskan Bush People's Bear Brown Shares Rare Photos of Kids

The Shadow of the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD) Fraud

The most significant "investigation" associated with the family remains the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend fraud case. Although the primary legal proceedings concluded in 2016, the repercussions and the "investigative tail" of this case reached into 2019, influencing how the public and Washington State authorities viewed the family’s claims.

Understanding the PFD Fraud Case

The Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend is a yearly payment made to Alaskans who have lived in the state for a full calendar year and intend to remain residents indefinitely. In 2014, an investigation by the Alaska Department of Revenue’s Criminal Investigations Unit revealed that the Brown family had lied on their applications.

  • The Charges: Billy Brown and several of his children were charged with a total of 60 counts of first-degree unsworn falsification and second-degree theft.
  • The Findings: Investigators proved that the family had spent significant time outside of Alaska between 2009 and 2012, making them ineligible for the dividends they had collected.
  • The 2019 Connection: By 2019, the family was essentially "persona non grata" in many Alaskan circles. The 2019 investigations in Washington were often framed by this past dishonesty. Critics argued that if the family had defrauded the State of Alaska regarding their residency, their claims of "bush living" in Washington should be treated with equal skepticism.

Legal Penalties and Their Long-Term Impact

In the settlement of the PFD case, Billy and Joshua "Bam Bam" Brown pleaded guilty to one count of second-degree unsworn falsification. They were sentenced to 30 days of electronic monitoring and required to pay back the stolen funds plus fines. The fact that the patriarch of the "Alaskan Bush People" was legally documented as having not lived in the Alaskan bush during the heights of the show’s popularity created a credibility gap that the production team worked to manage throughout 2019.

Authenticity Investigations: Reality vs. Scripting

In 2019, "Alaskan Bush People" faced an intensified level of "digital investigation" from skeptical viewers. Using satellite imagery (Google Earth), public property records, and local sightings, these amateur investigators sought to debunk the family's survivalist claims.

Key Areas of Scrutiny in 2019

Investigation Focus Reality TV Narrative Verified Reality (2019)
Residency Living entirely off the land in remote cabins. Regular stays in local hotels (Loomis/Tonasket) during filming.
Water Source Primitive hauling of water from streams. Existing well permits and modern plumbing infrastructure.
Energy Experimental "bush" windmills and wood stoves. Commercial-grade solar arrays and propane backup systems.
Safety Constant threat of predators and isolation. Proximity to emergency services in Okanogan County.

The "investigation" into these discrepancies often pointed to the production company, Park Slope Productions, suggesting that the "investigation" was less about the family's survival skills and more about the ethics of reality television production.

Billy Brown’s Health and Regulatory Complications

In 2019, Billy Brown suffered a significant medical emergency involving respiratory issues. This event triggered a different kind of "investigation"—one concerning the family's ability to maintain their ranch under federal and state health and safety guidelines.

Because the North Star Ranch was being used as a commercial filming location, it had to meet certain Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards for the crew, if not the family. Billy’s declining health in 2019 raised questions about the sustainability of the "hard labor" lifestyle depicted on screen. Critics and investigators noted that the family was increasingly relying on modern medical technology and professional contractors to maintain the ranch, which contradicted the "do-it-yourself" ethos of the show.

Summary of Legal and Administrative Challenges (2019)

  1. Okanogan County Building Department: Frequent checks on the structural safety of the unconventional buildings on North Star Ranch.
  2. Alaska Department of Revenue: Continued monitoring of the family's financial restitution following the PFD fraud settlement.
  3. Washington State Department of Ecology: Scrutiny regarding land clearing and the impact on local wildlife habitats in the North Cascades.
  4. Public Records Requests: Journalists and skeptics frequently filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for the family’s hunting and fishing licenses to verify if they were actually harvesting their own food as claimed.

The Role of the Discovery Channel

Throughout the various investigations of 2019, the Discovery Channel maintained a supportive but distanced stance. The network’s legal team had to ensure that the "investigations" into permit violations did not halt production. This led to a more "sanitized" version of the bush lifestyle in later seasons, where the family was seen interacting more with the "outside world," likely as a way to mitigate the legal risks associated with claiming they were living in total isolation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did anyone go to jail as a result of the 2019 investigations?

No. Unlike the PFD fraud case in Alaska (which resulted in electronic monitoring in 2016), the 2019 investigations in Washington were primarily administrative. They involved building permits, land use, and public scrutiny rather than criminal theft or fraud charges.

Was the "Alaskan Bush People" show cancelled due to these investigations?

The show was not cancelled in 2019. In fact, the controversy often fueled viewership. The production continued, although the narrative shifted significantly to focus on the family’s move to Washington and Billy Brown's health struggles.

How much did the Brown family have to pay back to Alaska?

In the 2016 settlement (which stayed in the news through 2019), Billy Brown was ordered to pay back $7,956 in dividends he shouldn't have received, plus a $10,000 fine. Other family members also had to repay their dividends, totaling over $20,000 in combined repayments and fines.

Is the "North Star Ranch" still under investigation today?

As of 2026, the North Star Ranch is no longer a primary target of active investigations, largely because the show’s production has changed following the death of Billy Brown in 2021. Most building permit issues were resolved or the structures were grandfathered in after meeting county codes.

Did the family actually live on the ranch in 2019?

The family did spend a significant amount of time on the ranch during filming seasons. However, local reports and "investigations" by neighbors consistently indicated that family members often stayed in nearby towns like Omak or Tonasket during the off-season or when the weather became extreme.

Practical Guidance for Researching Reality TV Legal History

If you are investigating the legal history of a high-profile reality TV family like the Browns, it is essential to look beyond tabloid headlines.

  • Access Public Records: Use the Okanogan County Auditor’s office for property deeds and the Planning Department for building permits.
  • Verify Court Dockets: For the Alaska PFD case, the Alaska Court System's "CourtView" provides the most accurate record of charges and sentencing.
  • Distinguish Between Civil and Criminal: Most 2019 issues were civil (permits and land use) rather than criminal (theft).
  • Check Environmental Filings: The Washington Department of Natural Resources often holds records regarding land use in wildfire-prone areas like where the ranch was located.

The 2019 period for the Alaskan Bush People was a time of transition where the "investigation" shifted from criminal fraud in the past to the administrative and social "investigation" of their new life in Washington. While they escaped further jail time, the scrutiny forced a more transparent—if less "wild"—depiction of their lives on television.